Global Nuclear Safety
National Research Nuclear University "MEPhI"
online version: ISSN 2499-9733
print version: ISSN 2305-414Х
2017-1(22)
undefined
| Article Name | Key Performance Indicators as Economic Security Tool of the Rosatom State Corporation Enterprises |
|---|---|
| Authors | I.A. Ukhalina*, N.A. Efimenko**, S.P. Agapova*** |
| Address | Volgodonsk Engineering Technical Institute the branch of National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”, |
| Abstract | Article is devoted to questions of the key performance indicators (KPI) using as the economic security tool of the Rosastom Group enterprises. Researches in the field of economic security and economic stability of the industrial enterprises have shown that internal and external threats have an impact on efficiency of the enterprises, their competitiveness. In article the emphasis that reserves of increase in resistance to competitive resistance in the market of nuclear and power industry in which activity of the Rosastom Group enterprise is carried out, should be scooped first of all in internal sources and resource potential is placed. Use of a deductive method of the economic analysis has allowed to decapacitate the main indicators of efficiency of industrial enterprise activity, having defined the private indicators exerting impact on the main indicator of state corporation activity – the Corrected Free Cash Flow (CFCF). Carrying out a research of efficiency indicators from "the general to private" it is possible to isolate key indicators of efficiency of different level of hierarchy and to cascade tasks on appropriate levels of management and to bring to specific performers. The directions and ways of increase in efficiency of activities for the main KPI are defined. As a result it was noted that command success in key performance indicators leads to increase in competitiveness of the enterprises and corporation in general and to strengthening of Rosatom State Corporation positions in the local and international market, thus to strengthening of enterprise economic security. |
| Keywords | enterprise economic security, Key Performance Indicators (KPI), EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Corrected Free Cash Flow (CFCF) |
| Language | Russian |
| References | [1] Kozachenko A.V., Ponomarev V.P. Metodicheskie osnovy otsenki urovnia ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti predpriiatiia [Methodical bases of assessment of enterprise economic security level]. Regionalnye perspektivy [Regional prospects], 2007, №2-3(9-10). – pp. 104–106. (in Ukrainian) [2] Fokina N.P. Ekonomika predprinimatelstva – vazhneishaia sostavliaiushchaia finansovoi ustoichivosti [Business economy is the most important component of financial stability]. Aktualnye problemy ekonomiki [Urgent problems of economics], 2006, №8, ISSN 1993-6788, pp. 111–114. (in Ukrainian) [3] Efimenko N.A., Ukhalina I.A. Konkurentnye preimushchestva Rossii na mirovom rynke otrabotannogo iadernogo topliva [Competitive advantages of Russia in the world market of the fulfilled nuclear fuel]. Globalnaia iadernaia bezopasnost [Global nuclear safety], 2014, №4(13), ISSN 2305-414X, eISSN 2499-9733, pp. 96–98. (in Russian) [4] Efimenko N.A., Ukhalina I.A., Agapova S.P. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiia biznesa Goskorporatsii «Rosatom» v sfere Back-End [Problems and the prospects of business development of ROSATOM State Corporation in Back-End sphere]. Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniia [Progress of modern science and education], 2017, Vol. 2, №1, ISSN 2412-9631, pp. 144–147. (in Russian) [5] Ponomarev-Stepnoi N. Na put ustoichivogo razvitiia [On the way of sustainable development]. REA [REU], 2016, №1, pp. 18. (in Russian) [6] Golovko M.V. Faktory i vektor ekonomicheskogo razvitiia promyshlennykh predpriiatii atomnogo mashinostroeniia [Factors and vector of industrial enterprises economic development of atomic mechanical engineering]. Globalnaia iadernaia bezopasnost [Global nuclear safety], 2016, №2(19), ISSN 2305-414X, eISSN 2499-9733, pp. 83–97. (in Russian) [7] Migalin S. Pokazatel komandnoi raboty [Indicator of team work]. REA [REU], 2016, №3, pp. 14–23. (in Russian) [8] Tkebuchava D. Cherez prizmu effektivnosti [Through an efficiency prism]. REA [REU], 2016, №3, pp. 8–11. (in Russian) [9] Panov M.M. Otsenka deiatelnosti i sistema upravleniia kompaniei na osnove KPI [Assessment of activity and control system of the company on the KPI basis]. M. Pub. Infra-M, 2013. ISBN 978-5-16-005781-1, 255 p. (in Russian) [10] Klochkov A. K. KPI i motivatsiia personala. Polnyi sbornik prakticheskikh instrumentov [KPI and motivation of personnel. Full collection of practical tools]. Pub. Eksmo, 2010, ISBN 978-5-699-37901-9, 160 s. (in Russian) [11] David Parmenter. Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing and Using Winning KPI's. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, inc., 2007, ISBN 0-470-09588-1 pp. 233. (in English) [12] Iliasov F.N. Tarifnaia setka, sistema greidov na osnove zakona Vebera [Scale of charges, system of grades on the Weber law basis]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny [Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes], 2012, №6, ISSN 2219-5467, pp. 128–135. (in Russian) [13] Golovko M.V., Rudenko V.A. Korporativnye tsennosti v sisteme ustoichivogo razvitiia i bezopasnosti razvitiia promyshlennykh predpriiatii (na primere GK «Rosatom») [Corporate values in system of sustainable development and safety of development of the industrial enterprises (on the example of Rosatom State Corporation)]. Globalnaia iadernaia bezopasnost [Global nuclear safety], 2015, №4(17), ISSN 2305-414X, eISSN 2499-9733, pp. 103–114. (in Russian) [14] Dorofeeva N., Altunina O. Otsenit bestsennyi resurs [To estimate an invaluable resource]. REA [REU], 2016, №3. S. 28–35. (in Russian) |
| Papers | 102 - 112 |
| URL Article | URL Article |
| Open Article |